CAD-RADS 2.0 reporting

The standardized reporting system for coronary CT — category scale, modifiers (S / G / V / N), and management pathways for stable and acute chest pain.

Plaque composition, the stenosis-severity ladder, and how both roll up into CAD-RADS 0–5.

The Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) was created to provide a standardized reporting system for coronary CT angiography. Its primary goal is to improve communication between the ordering provider and the reading clinician — and to provide specific recommendations that guide further patient management.

The CAD-RADS classification is assigned based entirely on the highest-grade lesion detected on the scan.

1 Stenosis categories

CatSeverityStenosisRecommendation
0 No plaque 0% Routine care
1 Minimal 1–24% FRS · preventive
2 Mild 25–49% Preventive · consider statin
3 Moderate 50–69% Functional / CT-FFR
4 Severe 70–99% ICA · revascularization eval
5 Occlusion 100% ICA · MDT review

A few categories have important sub-rules:

1
4 — Severe (probable flow-limiting)

Subdivided by extent:
4A: 70–99% stenosis in a single vessel or two vessels.
4B: > 50% stenosis in the left main, or 3-vessel obstructive disease (≥ 70% in three vessels).

2
5 — Total occlusion

100% stenosis. Subdivided into subtotal vs chronic total occlusion (CTO). A CTO is generally defined by > 3 months of symptoms or a lesion > 10 mm in length on CTA.

3
N — Non-diagnostic

The N classification has two distinct uses depending on what else is on the scan:
As an overall category (CAD-RADS N) — when the highest-grade stenosis is non-obstructive (< 50%) but at least one segment is non-evaluable, the report is downgraded to N because obstructive disease can’t be safely excluded.
As a modifier (e.g. CAD-RADS 4/N) — when there’s a known obstructive stenosis (≥ 50%, i.e. categories 3, 4, or 5) alongside a non-evaluable segment, the N is simply appended.

2 Modifiers

Categories are frequently complemented by modifiers. When more than one is present, separate them with a / (e.g. CAD-RADS 4/S/G/V).

1
S — Stent

Indicates the presence of a stent anywhere in the coronary system.

2
G — Graft

Indicates the presence of a surgical bypass graft.

3
V — Vulnerable plaque

Apply when the plaque exhibits at least two high-risk features:

  • Positive remodeling
  • Low attenuation / low-density necrotic core (< 30 HU)
  • Spotty calcification
  • Napkin-ring sign — central dark low-attenuation plaque with a brighter peripheral rim
4
N — Non-evaluable segment

See the dual-use rule above — either upgrades to an overall N (when stenosis is non-obstructive) or appends as a modifier (when obstructive disease is already present).

3 Sample impression

Impression ?
$

CAD-RADS 4A / P3 / HRP / N

// severe stenosis · plaque burden P3 · high-risk features · one non-diagnostic segment

4 Clinical management

CAD-RADS provides branching management pathways depending on whether the patient presents with stable or acute chest pain.

Stable chest pain

CategoryRecommendation
CAD-RADS 0Reassurance; consider non-atherosclerotic causes of chest pain.
CAD-RADS 1 & 2Preventive therapy and risk-factor modification per guidelines.
CAD-RADS 3Functional assessment (stress test or CT-FFR) to determine if the moderate lesion is flow-limiting.
CAD-RADS 4AICA or functional assessment.
CAD-RADS 4BICA strongly recommended.
CAD-RADS 5ICA or functional / viability assessment.

Acute chest pain

CategoryACS likelihoodRecommendation
CAD-RADS 0 & 1Highly unlikelyConsider non-ACS etiologies; outpatient follow-up.
CAD-RADS 2UnlikelyOutpatient follow-up — but if clinical suspicion is high or the V modifier is present, admit and consult cardiology.
CAD-RADS 3PossibleAdmit; cardiology consult; functional testing and/or ICA.
CAD-RADS 4 & 5Likely / very likelyAdmit; cardiology consult; expedite ICA and appropriate revascularization.

Next steps

Open the report builder →
Use the structured form to auto-generate the impression
Plaque burden (P-modifier) →
Detailed criteria for assigning P1–P4
Reconstruction views →
CPR is the right view for grading stenosis
Risk-to-Action calculator →
Map the impression to a clinical recommendation
References
1 — Cury RC et al. CAD-RADS 2.0. JCCT 2022;16(6):536–557. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2022.07.002
2 — SCCT expert consensus on reporting modifiers. JCCT 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2023.04.005
3 — Motoyama S et al. Plaque characterization & acute coronary events. JACC 2015;66(4):337–346.
4 — Nørgaard BL et al. NXT trial — CT-FFR diagnostic performance. JACC 2014;63(12):1145–1155.
← previous
17-segment model
next →
Dominance: R, L & codominant