TAVR planning

Aortic annulus sizing, coronary ostia heights, iliofemoral access, and co-planar angles — the four CT measurements that determine whether TAVR is safe.

Essential CT measurements for transcatheter procedure planning: TAVR (annulus sizing, coronary ostia, vascular access) and MitraClip/mitral repair (annulus dimensions, coronary sinus location, transseptal puncture, LAA thrombus rule-out).

TAVR (Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement) is a non-surgical alternative for replacing a calcified, stenotic aortic valve. Comprehensive CT planning is mandated before the procedure to evaluate several critical anatomical metrics.

1 Aortic annulus sizing

The aortic annulus is a non-circular structure — 2D echocardiography frequently underestimates its size. CT provides accurate 3D planimetric measurements.

  • Measurements are taken during mid-systole (20–40% of the R-R interval) to capture the maximal and stabilized valve opening.
  • Sizing rules. The prosthesis generally should not be > 15% oversized or > 5% undersized compared to the native annulus.

Improper sizing risks post-procedural paravalvular leak (undersizing) or annular rupture (oversizing) — both of which can be catastrophic.

2 Coronary ostia heights

If the coronary ostia are located too low, deploying the new valve could displace the native calcified leaflets over the ostia — causing a catastrophic coronary occlusion.

Measure the height of both LCA and RCA ostia from the annulus plane. Low ostia (typically < 10–12 mm) may require alternative valve selection or coronary protection during deployment.

3 Vascular access

A non-gated CT angiogram of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis determines if a transfemoral approach is viable. Most transcatheter valves require:

  • Minimum common femoral artery diameter ≥ 6 mm
  • Minimal calcification and tortuosity of the iliofemoral tree
  • Absence of dissection

If transfemoral access is unsuitable, alternative routes include transapical, subclavian, or transcaval.

4 Co-planar angles

CT datasets can predict the optimal fluoroscopic projection angles (orthogonal to the native valve plane) for the catheterization lab. This simulation:

  • Substantially reduces the need for repeat aortograms
  • Saves procedural time
  • Reduces radiation exposure
  • Lowers contrast administration
← previous
Structural heart — overview
next →
LAA occlusion planning